APS Response to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Referee Response Form forPh值ysical Review- Letters

Insert X in the parentheses in the response form as appropriate.

Referee:
Manuscript Number:
Author:
Title:

1. Please summarize your assessment of the paper:

YES MAYBE NO
Does the paper contain enough significant new physics to warrant publication in thePh值ysical Review? ( ) ( ) ( )
Does the paper warrant the consideration as a Letter? ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading? ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the paper well organized and clearly written? ( ) ( ) ( )
Are the subject matter and style of presentation appropriate for thePh值ysical Review? ( ) ( ) ( )
Is the length appropriate? ( ) ( ) ( )
2. Please evaluate quality of Research and Presentation:
Research Presentation
Excellent ( ) ( )
Good ( ) ( )
Average ( ) ( )
Marginal ( ) ( )
Poor ( ) ( )
3.推荐:
( ) Publish without change (please give reasons in report).
( ) Publish after authors have considered the optional revisions mentioned in the report.
( ) Publish after authors have made the revisions mentioned in the report. (I do not need to see the manuscript again.)
( ) Revisions are necessary. Return to me on resubmittal.
( ) Revisions are necessary. On resubmittal, send to:
(Use as much space as needed to list names of alternative reviewers.)
( ) Manuscript is more appropriate for
another ( ) journal (specify):
or ( ) section (specify):
( ) Do not publish; see report.
( ) Other; see report.

Begin report (use as much space as is needed). Please refrain from using gender-specific pronouns to refer to the author(s) (seeGuidelines for Referees):



End report.

Sign up to receive regular email alerts fromPh值ysical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×
Baidu