Insert X in the parentheses in the response form as appropriate.
Referee: |
Manuscript Number: |
Author: |
Title: |
1. Please summarize your assessment of the paper:
YES | MAYBE | NO | |
Does the paper contain enough significant new physics to warrant publication in thePh值ysical Review? | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Does the paper warrant the consideration as a Letter? | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading? | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Is the paper well organized and clearly written? | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Are the subject matter and style of presentation appropriate for thePh值ysical Review? | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Is the length appropriate? | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Research | Presentation | |
Excellent | ( ) | ( ) |
Good | ( ) | ( ) |
Average | ( ) | ( ) |
Marginal | ( ) | ( ) |
Poor | ( ) | ( ) |
( ) Publish without change (please give reasons in report). |
( ) Publish after authors have considered the optional revisions mentioned in the report. |
( ) Publish after authors have made the revisions mentioned in the report. (I do not need to see the manuscript again.) |
( ) Revisions are necessary. Return to me on resubmittal. |
( ) Revisions are necessary. On resubmittal, send to: (Use as much space as needed to list names of alternative reviewers.) |
( ) Manuscript is more appropriate for another ( ) journal (specify): or ( ) section (specify): |
( ) Do not publish; see report. |
( ) Other; see report. |
Begin report (use as much space as is needed). Please refrain from using gender-specific pronouns to refer to the author(s) (seeGuidelines for Referees):
End report.